Legal Opinion

Sears v. Fowler

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 20, 1987No. 22754PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Justice:

Respondent, a judgment creditor, appealed from a judgment in her favor on the ground that the judgment was inadequate. We affirmed the judgment on appeal. The circuit court found that respondent was entitled to receive interest on the judgment during the pendency of the appeal. We disagree and reverse.

This action and a companion case were tried by a jury. On January 5, 1984, a verdict was rendered in respondent’s favor in the amount of $16,500 actual damages. The jury verdict in the companion case for loss of consortium was in favor of respondent’s husband for zero dollars.

Res…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Southern Real Estate & Financial Co. v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Turner Coleman, Inc. v. Ohio Construction & Engineering, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  3. Horry County v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Butler Contracting, Inc. v. Court Street, LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  2. Babb v. RothrockSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  3. Calhoun v. CalhounSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  4. Russo v. SuttonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  5. UTILITIES CONST. CO., INC. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API