Legal Opinion
Babb v. Rothrock
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided February 1, 1993No. 23788PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Toal, Justice:
The issues presented in this appeal are whether the appellant (hereinafter “Babb”) is entitled to prejudgment interest from his co-guarantor (hereinafter “Schild”) from the date he paid the entire obligation on the note which he and Schild, along with two others, personally guaranteed, and whether Babb is entitled to postjudgment interest during the pendency of the earlier appeal in this case.
FACTS
Babb and Schild, along with Rothrock and Hendrix, who are not parties to this appeal, were shareholders of Anchor Management, Inc. (hereinafter “AMI”). In 1983, Babb took management…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Southern Welding Works, Inc. v. K & S Construction Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
- Wayne Smith Construction Co. v. Wolman, Duberstein, & ThompsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
- Sears v. FowlerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- Babb v. RothrockSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Edens v. South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Future Group, II v. NationsbankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- Vanwyk Textile Systems, B v. v. Zimmer MacHinery America, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1997
- Butler Contracting, Inc. v. Court Street, LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- QHG of Lake City, Inc. v. McCutcheonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- SMITH-HUNTER CONST. CO., INC. v. HopsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.