Legal Opinion

UTILITIES CONST. CO., INC. v. Wilson

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided March 4, 1996No. 2475PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

This appeal emanates from an order granting attorney fees and interpreting a jury verdict. Utilities Construction Company, Inc. (Utilities), an electrical contractor, filed a complaint against Mary Wilson alleging causes of action for foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien, unjust enrichment, and breach of contract. The action arose out of work performed by Utilities on property located at the Rainbow Market in Charleston. The court directed a verdict in favor of Wilson on the mechanic’s lien cause of action because Utilities failed to timely serve notice of the mechanic’s lien. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Prosperi v. Code, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. Emery v. International Glass & Mfg., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  3. Parker v. MorinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  4. Sears v. FowlerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  5. T.W. Morton Builders Inc. v. Von BuedingenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stephen v. Avins Construction Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  2. Carolina Alliance for Fair Employment v. South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing, & RegulationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  3. Route Triple Seven Ltd. Partnership v. Total Hockey, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
  4. Seckinger v. Vessel, ExcaliburCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  5. Keeney's Metal Roofing, Inc. v. PalmieriCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API