Legal Opinion
Santiago v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided February 21, 1997No. 89-CV-876PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
MUNSON, Senior District Judge.
Defendants move for summary judgment in this case concerning the repercussions of an allegedly botched drug urinalysis. The court entertained oral argument on October 11, 1996 at its regular motion term in Syracuse, New York. The following constitutes the memorandum-decision and order of the court.
I. BACKGROUND
The plaintiff in this matter is a bus driver by profession, having been first hired by the Trailways company in 1980. The defendant Greyhound Lines acquired Trailways in July 1987. At that time plaintiff was based out of New…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Pasternack v. Laboratory Corp. of America HoldingsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Lapsley v. Columbia University-College of Physicians & SurgeonsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Lacoparra v. Pergament Home Centers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Mission Petroleum Carriers, Inc. v. SolomonTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Fierro v. Saks Fifth AvenueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.