Legal Opinion

People v. Dye

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 1967No. Docket 1,976PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtT. Gr. Kavanagh, J.

Defendant, with counsel present, entered a plea of guilty to the charge of breaking and entering a business place in nighttime with the intent to commit larceny on January 30, 1960. * Defendant’s counsel was not present when sentence. was imposed and this appeal is based on the assertion that this constituted error.

It is claimed that the effective “assistance of counsel” which is guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution requires that counsel be present at the sentencing of one convicted of a crime. The Federal courts have almost unanimously adopted this view.

“The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Moore v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. State ex rel. Searles v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. People v. MalkowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  2. People v. EvansMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. People v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  4. People v. AndersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. People v. OliverMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API