Legal Opinion

People v. Malkowski

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1971No. 20 April Term 1971, Docket No. 52,941PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

Defendant Lee Malkowski pled guilty to unlawfully driving away an automobile on April 8, 1969. Two days later he was sentenced to from two to five years in prison. Defendant’s attorney asked to see the presentence report before sentencing and again at the sentencing. The trial judge, in denying the request to see the report, commented that “ * * * the statute which authorizes these reports also requires the confidentiality of these reports for the purposes that they are prepared and used and delivered to the court in connection with the sentences.” A requirement of confidentiality does not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Cummins v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. People v. DyeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Lane v. Department of Corrections, Parole BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  5. People v. ConnorMichigan Supreme Court · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. People v. ColesMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People v. McFarlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  3. People v. TriplettMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  4. People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  5. People v. HooperMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API