Legal Opinion
Leland v. St. Olaf Lutheran Church
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 5, 1944No. 83,749PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Magnet, Justice.
” Certiorari to review an order of the industrial commission which, after a rehearing, denied compensation to relator.
This case has been here before. Leland v. St. Olaf Lutheran Church, 213 Minn. 34, 4 N. W. (2d) 769, where this court concluded that a rehearing should be had and remanded the case to the industrial commission for that purpose. The rehearing has been had, and this court is now asked to review the order of the commission again denying compensation.
The main facts are set out in the first opinion, and it is not necessary to restate them. There are some…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ogrosky v. Commonwealth Electric Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Leland v. St. Olaf Lutheran ChurchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Anderson v. Farwell, Ozmun, Kirk & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Rehak v. St. Paul Terminal Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Delich v. Thompson-Starret Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Zobitz v. City of ElySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Williams v. W. W. Wallwork, Moorhead, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950