Legal Opinion

Rehak v. St. Paul Terminal Warehouse Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 13, 1939No. 32,127PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holt, Justice.

Certiorari to review a decision of the industrial commission refusing to reopen, and adopting and affirming rjthe findings of the referee.

In denying relator’s motion to reopen the case for the taking of further testimony, after the referee’s decision, the commission was in the exercise of judicial discretion, and there is no indication in the record of an abuse of such discretion. There is a contention that since there was a division of opinion between the medical experts heard by the referee as to the cause of relator’s-present disability, the commission acted contrary to law…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jones v. Excelsior Laundry Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. Sivald v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lappinen v. Union Ore Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. Bomersine v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  3. Hosking v. METROPOLITAN HOUSE MOVERS CORPORATIONSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  4. Jacobson v. Uptown Transfer & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  5. Leland v. St. Olaf Lutheran ChurchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API