Legal Opinion
Perkins v. General Motors Corp.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided April 10, 1989No. 87-0048-CV-W-9PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER GRANTING JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF
BARTLETT, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Plaintiff Melody Perkins brings this action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. Perkins, a female supervisor at the General Motors (G.M.) Fairfax Plant in Kansas City, Kansas (Fairfax), contends that she was unlawfully discriminated against by G.M. on the basis of her sex in violation of § 703 of the Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2.
Perkins maintains that she was the victim of sexual harassment between August…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Barbara J. HENSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF DUNDEE, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Darla G. Hall, Patty J. Baxter and Jeannette Ticknor v. Gus Construction Co., Inc. And John MundorfCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Perkins v. SpiveyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Balletti v. Sun-Sentinel Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1995
- Fall v. Indiana University Board of TrusteesDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1998
- Perkins v. General Motors Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1990
- Cobb v. Anheuser Busch, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.