Legal Opinion
Klemme v. Long
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 11, 1931No. 27,966PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Action at law to recover damages for fraud and deceit. There was a verdict for the plaintiffs for $7,500. The defendant moved in the alternative.for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial. The motion for judgment ivas granted. The plaintiffs appeal from the judgment.
On October 2, 1919, H. J. Edison entered into a contract for the sale of a quarter section of land in Dodge county to one Sievert, who was plaintiffs’ son-in-law. Edison was the owner of the equitable title under a contract of sale from one Koranda, the owner of the legal title. Sievert paid Edison $2,000 cash, was to…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Power Manufacturing Co. v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Canadian Northern Railway Co. v. EggenSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- District Township of Boomer v. FrenchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
- Faust v. HosfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- McKay v. McCarthySupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gennifer Flowers v. James Carville Hillary Rodham Clinton Little, Brown & Co. George StephanopoulosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Shema v. Thorpe Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Anglo California National Bank v. KleinNew York Supreme Court · 1936
- Christenson v. Village of HibbingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Devine v. Rayette-Faberge, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1968