Legal Opinion
Wills v. Keystone Tank-Ship Corp.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided January 14, 1952No. 13851PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
YANKWICH, Chief Judge.
The above entitled cause heretofore tried, argued and submitted, is now decided as follows:
Judgment will be for the defendants, that the plaintiff take nothing by his complaint, and that the defendants have judgment against the plaintiff for their costs incurred herein.
Findings and judgment to be prepared by counsel for the defendants under local rule
7
Comment.
I.n two causes of action in an amended complaint, plaintiff sued for damages and loss of wages by reason of an injury suffered on December 23, 1951, while employed as a seaman on the vessel Bunker Hill.
The vessel…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Farrell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- De Zon v. American President Lines, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Lake v. Standard Fruit & Steamship Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Pacific Mail S. S. Co. v. LucasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1920
- McManus v. Marine Transport Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fish v. Richfield Oil CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1959