Vattier v. Hinde
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL lVom the circuit -court of the United States for the dist rict of Ohio. This case was before the court at January term 1828,1 Peters, 241, on an appeal by the parties who are now appellants.
Read the full summary
APPEAL lVom the circuit -court of the United States for the dist rict of Ohio. This case was before the court at January term 1828,1 Peters, 241, on an appeal by the parties who are now appellants. The court, at that term, reversed the decrete of the circuit court of Ohio, because a certain Abraham Garrison had not been made a party in that court; and the cause was remanded “ With instructions to permit the complainants, the appellees, to amend their bill and to make proper parties, and to proceed de novo in the cause from the filing of such amended bill, as law and equity might require.” In…
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Marshall
This suit was originally brought in the court of the United States, for the seventh circuit and district of Ohio, sitting in chancery, by Thomas S. Hinde and Belinda his wife, for the conveyance of a lot of ground in the town of Cincinnati, designated in the plain of the town by the number 86.
The bill alleges that Abraham Garrison, under whom all parties claim, sold and conveyed the said lot of ground to William and Michael Jones, as is proved by his receipt in the following words. “Received, Cincinnati, 10th September 1790, of William and Michael Jones, fifty pounds thirteen shillings and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Mollan v. TorranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Craig v. LeslieSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
- James Conolly and Others v. Richard Taylor and OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
3Cited by91 opinions
- Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Louisiana v. JumelSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Mark Waldorf, in No. 97-5195 v. Edward J. Shuta Carolyn Wood Kenneth C. Spence, Jr. Mary Kay Spence Borough of Kenilworth Joseph Rego Henry J. Moll Victor Smith Lawrence Stickle Charles David Joseph Ventre Thomas Neville William J. Ahern William E. Conrad Livio Mancino Gary Rowinsky Mario Dibella Vincent Scorese Harry Grapenthin Mary Kelly Richard McCormack William Holt A. Zeleniak Richard Lomax C. William Gutekunst Frederick Bailey Michael Padula Charles Scheuermann Fred Sues Joseph Walyuf Thomas McHale Philip Ernst Frank J. Mascaro Walter E. Boright, Jr. Albert Simmenroth James E. O'Brien Frank J. Johdof Raymond Blydenburgh Edward Kasbarian John J. O'LOck Edmac Enterprises Edward McDermott Mark Waldorf v. Edward J. Shuta Carolyn Wood Kenneth C. Spence, Jr. Mary Kay Spence Borough of Kenilworth Joseph Rego Henry J. Moll Victor Smith Lawrence Stickle Charles David Joseph Ventre Thomas Neville William J. Ahern William E. Conrad Livio Mancino Gary Rowinsky Mario Dibella Vincent Scorese Harry Grapenthin Mary Kelly Richard McCormack William Holt A. Zeleniak Richard Lomax C. William Gutekunst Frederick Bailey Michael Padula Charles Scheuermann Fred Sues Joseph Walyuf Thomas McHale Philip Ernst Frank J. Mascaro Walter E. Boright, Jr. Albert Simmenroth James E. O'Brien Frank J. Johdof Raymond Blydenburgh Edward Kasbarian John J. O'LOck Edmac Enterprises Edward McDermott Borough of Kenilworth, in No. 97-5222Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Townsend v. LittleSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Bryant v. PepcoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.