E.M.F. v. N.N.
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Judge.
Respondent, N.N., appeals the jury verdict finding that he is the father of the minor child, T.N.F., arguing that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence the results of the human leukocyte antigen test, in denying his motion for new trial based on jury misconduct and on newly discovered evidence, and in granting attorney fees and court costs to the petitioner, E.M.F. We affirm.
E.M.F. filed this paternity action alleging that N.N. was the biological father of her child, T.N.F. The parties, with their respective attorneys, stipulated to obtaining blood tests including…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- United States v. Steven John AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- People v. AndersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Cramer v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- People v. QuintanarColorado Court of Appeals · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Schultz v. WellsColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
- City of Aurora v. VaughnColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. BanksColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
- People ex rel. M.P.R.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1986
- People in Interest of EHColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.