Legal Opinion

People in Interest of EH

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided May 21, 1992No. 91CA0448PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

837 P.2d 284 (1992)

The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Petitioner-Appellee,

In the Interest of E.H. and S.W., Children, and Concerning B.W. n/k/a B.S., Respondent-Appellant,

and R.H., Respondent-Appellee.

No. 91CA0448.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I.

May 21, 1992.

Rehearing Denied June 18, 1992.

Certiorari Denied October 13, 1992.

Michael J. Schingle, Fort Morgan, for petitioner-appellee.

Edgar H. Brandenburg, Brush, guardian ad litem.

Eric C. Jorgenson, Fort Morgan, for respondent-appellant.

Douglas R. Asmus, Yuma, for respondent-appellee.

Opinion by Judge HUME.

B.W. (mother) appeals from a judgment…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, In the Interest of M.M., a Child, and concerning C.M.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. People v. McKennaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  3. In the Interest of ClintonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  4. Jakobleff v. Cerrato, Sweeney & CohnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. A,B,C,D,E,F,G, & H v. District Court of the Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. A.N.W.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. People v. BathColorado Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API