Legal Opinion

Cascade Corporation v. Rose

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 24, 1988No. WCB 84-12425, 84-09803; CA A41753PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Cascade Corporation (Cascade) seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order, issued in an ORS 656.307 proceeding, holding it responsible for claimant’s aggravation claim. Claimant cross-petitions for review of the Board’s reversal of the referee’s award of insurer-paid attorney fees. On de novo review, we affirm.

In April, 1982, claimant suffered a compensable injury to his right knee while employed by Cascade. His treating physician, Dr. Wells, repeatedly advised that he undergo arthroscopic surgery, but Cascade denied the request for surgery. In June, 1984, during a hearing on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boise Cascade Corp. v. StarbuckOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Forney v. Western States PlywoodOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Petshow v. Farm Bureau InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nomeland v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. James River Corp. v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. Mercer Industries v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API