Legal Opinion

Eisel v. Midwest BankCentre

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided August 21, 2007No. SC 88167PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM. 1

Overview

Midwest BankCentre charged Patricia and Clark Eisel a document preparation fee in connection with real estate financing transactions. The Eisels, appointed as class representatives for this suit, contend the fee violates section 484.020.1’s ban on the unauthorized practice or doing of law. 2 The trial court agreed with the Eisels and awarded treble damages under section 484.020.2 as well as other damages and costs.

The document preparation fees at issue violate a plain reading of sections 484.010 and 484.020. Under the facts of this case, the statutes are not inconsistent…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brady v. PettitKentucky Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Hulse v. CrigerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  3. Smith v. ShawSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  4. Hanch v. K. F. C. National Management Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  5. Junior College District of St. Louis v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Huch v. Charter Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  2. Hargis v. JLB Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  3. Carpenter v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  4. Thomas Binkley, Harlene J. Binkley, Roland E. Sturhahn, and Susan J. Sturhahn v. American Equity Mortgage, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  5. Robert McKeage v. TMBC, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API