Legal Opinion

Vaillancourt v. Concord General Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 31, 1977No. 7512PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C.J.

This is a declaratory judgment suit, RSA 491:22, seeking a determination of the rights and duties of the parties under a homeowners insurance policy that the defendant issued to the plaintiff Jean Vaillancourt. Max Tannenbaum, intervenor, was injured on November 3, 1968, while riding as a passenger on a snowmobile which the plaintiff was driving. The plaintiff’s policy does not provide coverage for bodily injury arising out of the use of automobiles off the premises of the insured. See Cunningham & Price, Automobile, Watercraft and Aircraft Exclusion in Homeowners Policy, 41 Ins. Counsel J.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Merchants Mutual Casualty Co. v. LambertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1940
  2. Sun Insurance v. HamanneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  3. Varney v. Coleman Company, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1974
  4. State v. Wilton RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
  5. Oberstar v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bolduc v. Herbert Schneider Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  2. In Re GambleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  3. Thedin v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. HartSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  5. Mass. Bay Ins. Co. v. Am. Healthcare Servs. Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API