Legal Opinion

State v. Maupin

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1993PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DROWOTA, Justice.

We granted Maupin’s Rule 11 Application to decide whether the double jeopardy clauses of the Tennessee or United States Constitutions forbid retrial of lesser included offenses under the circumstances presented. The Defendant, Denise Maupin, was convicted by a jury of aiding and abetting the first degree child abuse murder of her two-year-old son, Jay Michael Maupin, and was sentenced to life imprisonment. The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed the conviction based on insufficiency of evidence and remanded the case for trial on lesser included offenses. After the Court…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Hudson v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. DorantesTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. GoodwinTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. BurnsTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. RushTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. MounceTennessee Supreme Court · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API