Legal Opinion
State v. Mounce
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided August 2, 1993PublishedCited by 94 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DROWOTA, Justice.
The Defendant, Roy L. Mounce, has appealed from the judgments of the lower courts holding that he can be retried for driving while under the influence of an intoxicant after the trial court declared a mistrial under the unique circumstances described below. We granted the Defendant’s Rule 11 Application to decide whether a subsequent prosecution for the same charge of driving while under the influence is prohibited by the double jeopardy clauses of the state and federal constitutions.
The Defendant was indicted in Morgan County for driving while under the influence of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- State v. HallTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. StephensonTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. NicholsTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. DellingerTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. WatkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.