Schavoir v. American Re-Bonded Leather Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, J.
The plaintiff brings this action to restrain the defendant from using or disclosing a certain formula and process which he claims to have originated and disclosed to the defendant under its promise to keep it secret and to use it only when authorized by him.
For several years prior to 1923 the plaintiff had been engaged in manufacturing various kinds of rubber goods and specialties. In and prior to that year, he, with his son, had been experimenting in the effort to produce a cushion fabric, known as channel cloth, to be placed between the metal piece which holds the glass in automobile…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Expanded Metal Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Powder Co. v. MaslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Peabody v. NorfolkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Tabor v. . HoffmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Kaumagraph Co. v. . Stampagraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Smith v. Dravo Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
- Franke v. WiltschekCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- The A. H. Emery Company v. Marcan Products Corporation, Marshall Control Products Corp., Hugh A. Mills, Ronald R. Marshall, and David E. GoldingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Allen Manufacturing Co. v. LoikaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Allen-Qualley Co. v. Shellmar Products Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1929
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.