Legal Opinion

Larson v. Larson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1975No. File 11653PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINANS, Justice.

Our concern in this action is twofold: the possible abatement of an action for divorce when one party to that action dies in the course of the proceedings on the one hand and the trial court’s capacity to enter a nunc pro tunc decree in such situations on the other hand. In this situation it- is our decision that the divorce action abated with the death of the defendant, Verlyn G. Larson, and that the trial judge exceeded his powers in entering a nunc pro tunc decree several months after the defendant’s death apparently awarding a divorce and certain properties to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sahler v. SahlerSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  2. Williams v. WilliamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Bevelle v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Heck v. BaileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Bunnell v. KindtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Thorson v. ThorsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Jaris v. TuckerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. Albrecht v. AlbrechtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. In Re the Marriage of LawrenceMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Andersen v. AndersenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API