Legal Opinion

Chloé v. Queen Bee of Beverly Hills, LLC

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 1, 2008No. 06 Civ. 3140(RJH)(MHD)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

RICHARD J. HOLWELL, District Judge.

This is an action for trademark infringement brought by plaintiffs Chloé and Chloé, S.A. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) against defendants Queen Bee of Beverly Hills, LLC, Sun-Eye Productions, Inc. (“Sun-Eye”), Rebecca Rushing, Simone Ubaldelli, Jennifer Suns, Mohammad Za-rafshan a/k/a Alexander Zar, and John Does 2-20. 1 Plaintiffs design and market women’s clothing and accessories, including handbags, which are sold under Chloé, S.A.’s registered CHLOÉ trademark (Benscher Decl. Ex. C, Nov. 5, 2007). Plaintiffs’ action arises out…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Robertson-Ceco Corp., United Dominion Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  5. Zippo Manufacturing Co. v. Zippo Dot Com, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1997

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Chloé v. Queen Bee of Beverly Hills, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  2. Royalty Network Inc. v. Dishant. Com, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  3. Gucci America, Inc. v. Frontline Processing Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  4. Krepps v. ReinerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  5. O'Keefe v. Blue & Gold Fleet, L.P.District Court, E.D. New York · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API