Legal Opinion
In re Appeal of Armitage
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided November 9, 2006No. 04-454PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.
¶ 1. Interested neighbors (“neighbors”) appeal an Environmental Court order granting Pittsford Enterprises, LLP and Joan S. Kelly (“applicants”) a conditional use permit and site plan approval to construct a new post office in the Town of Pittsford. The proposed site is located at the intersection of Route 7 and Plains Road. In 2002, neighbors appealed the zoning board of adjustment’s (ZBA) grant of a conditional use permit to the Environmental Court. The court reversed the ZBA and denied the application, without prejudice, because of erosion, traffic volume and traffic safety problems.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re Application of CarrierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- Berlin Convalescent Center, Inc. v. StonemanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
- Trickett v. OchsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- State v. CNA Ins. CompaniesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
- Scott v. City of NewportSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re ArmitageSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
- 114 College St. Permit AmendmentVermont Superior Court · 2007
- 114 College St. Permit AmendmentVermont Superior Court · 2007
- Lefgren Act 250 JO AppealVermont Superior Court · 2008