Legal Opinion

Glass v. St. Paul Park Carriage & Sleigh Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 30, 1890PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by plaintiffs from an order of the district court for Washington county, McCluer, J., presiding, striking out “that portion of the complaint having reference to the lien claimed therein.”

1Opinion of the Court

Collins, J.1

Plaintiffs in this action seek to obtain a judgment against the defendant first named on account of lumber and other building material sold and delivered, and to have said judgment declared a lien upon certain town lots, and the buildings thereon, for the construction of which, it is averred, the aforesaid building material was sold. A motion to strike out of the complaint all allegations pertaining to the lien was granted upon the ground that, as set forth in the pleading, they did not constitute facts sufficient to entitle plaintiffs to a lien upon the premises; plaintiffs…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lyon & Gribble v. LoganTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Lax v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  3. Bowman Lumber Co. v. NewtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  4. Folsom v. County of ChisagoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  5. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Menzel v. TubbsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. Willamette Mills Co. v. SheaOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Johnson v. SalterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API