Legal Opinion

Folsom v. County of Chisago

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 4, 1881PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Chi-sago county, Crosby, J., presiding, overruling a demurrer to the complaint. cited Ryan v. School-District No. 13, 27 Minn. 433.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This is an appeal from an order overruling defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint. The ground of demurrer was that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The action was brought to recover of the county the contract price of printing and publishing, in the newspaper of the plaintiff, (a weekly newspaper published in Chisago county, known as the *325Taylor’s Falls Journal,) the “fiscal statement” and “delinquent tax-list” of the county, for the year 1879, in pursuance of a contract made between plaintiff and defendant, January 8, 1879.

The first…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Taylor v. BlakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1866

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hinchliffe v. Minnesota Commercial Men's Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  2. Glass v. St. Paul Park Carriage & Sleigh Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  3. Goetz v. School-District No. 59Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API