Legal Opinion

Murray City v. Timmerman

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided April 12, 2012No. 20120060-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

2Per curiam

T1 Gerrit Timmerman seeks to appeal his conviction of multiple charged infractions after a trial de novo in district court. This is before the court on its own motion for summary disposition based on a lack of jurisdiction.

{2 Utah Code section 78A-7-118 provides for eriminal appeals from justice courts. See Utah Code Ann. § 78A-7-118 (2011). If a defendant files a timely notice of appeal from a justice court conviction, "a defendant is entitled to a trial de novo in the district court." Id. § 78A-7-118(1). "The right to an 'appeal' from a court not of record is satisfied by provision…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Myers v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Dean v. HenriodCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999
  3. State v. StevensUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Pleasant Grove City v. OrvisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Park City v. WoodhamUtah Supreme Court · 2024
  2. Murray City v. TimmermanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API