Murray City v. Timmerman
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
2Per curiam
T1 Gerrit Timmerman seeks to appeal his conviction of multiple charged infractions after a trial de novo in district court. This is before the court on its own motion for summary disposition based on a lack of jurisdiction.
{2 Utah Code section 78A-7-118 provides for eriminal appeals from justice courts. See Utah Code Ann. § 78A-7-118 (2011). If a defendant files a timely notice of appeal from a justice court conviction, "a defendant is entitled to a trial de novo in the district court." Id. § 78A-7-118(1). "The right to an 'appeal' from a court not of record is satisfied by provision…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Myers v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- Dean v. HenriodCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999
- State v. StevensUtah Supreme Court · 1986
- Pleasant Grove City v. OrvisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
4Cited by2 opinions
- Park City v. WoodhamUtah Supreme Court · 2024
- Murray City v. TimmermanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012