Legal Opinion

Park City v. Woodham

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 2024No. Case No. 20230112PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This opinion is subject to revision before final publication in the Pacific Reporter

2024 UT 3

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH PARK CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, Respondent, v. ROBERT EVAN WOODHAM, Petitioner. No. 20230112 Heard December 13, 2023 Filed February 8, 2024 On Certiorari to the Utah Court of Appeals Third District, Silver Summit The Honorable Richard E. Mrazik No. 225500023 Attorneys: Margaret D. Plane, Tricia Lake, Park City, for respondent Robert Evan Woodham, pro se petitioner JUSTICE POHLMAN authored the opinion of the Court, in which CHIEF JUSTICE DURRANT, ASSOCIATE…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Grantsville v. Redevelopment Agency of Tooele CityUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Neese v. Utah Bd. of Pardons & ParoleUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Utah Farm Production Credit Ass'n v. WattsUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Salt Lake City v. KiddUtah Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State v. MullinsUtah Supreme Court · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wittingham v. TNE Limited PartnershipUtah Supreme Court · 2024
  2. Callaspo-Brito v. BallhewCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2025
  3. Provo City v. GedoCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024
  4. Reyos v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API