Legal Opinion

Murray City v. Timmerman

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided April 12, 2012No. 20120060-CAPublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS ‐‐‐‐ooOoo‐‐‐‐ Murray City, ) PER CURIAM DECISION ) Plaintiff and Appellee, ) Case No. 20120060‐CA ) v. ) FILED ) (April 12, 2012) Gerrit Timmerman, ) )

2012 UT App 110

Defendant and Appellant. ) ‐‐‐‐‐ Third District, Salt Lake City Department, 115900211 The Honorable Todd M. Shaughnessy Attorneys: Gerrit Timmerman, Midvale, Appellant Pro Se Frank M. Nakamura and Briant J. Farnsworth II, Murray, for Appellee ‐‐‐‐‐ Before Judges McHugh, Davis, and Christiansen. ¶1 Gerrit Timmerman seeks to appeal his conviction of multiple charged infractions after a trial de novo in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Myers v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Dean v. HenriodCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999
  3. State v. StevensUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Pleasant Grove City v. OrvisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
  5. Murray City v. TimmermanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API