Legal Opinion

Inman v. Vogel

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1895No. 17,373PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Martin Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

This action was brought by appellee against appellant and Mary Inman, his wife, on a note executed by appellant, and to set aside, as fraudulent, a deed of conveyance executed by appellant to his wife, and to subject the land so conveyed to the payment of *139the judgment that might be rendered on said note and the balance due on another judgment that appellee had before that time recovered against appellant. To this -complaint appellant and his wife filed an answer in two paragraphs, and appellee filed a reply to the second paragraph of answer.

The court below tried the cause and by request of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gregory v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Benbow v. GarrardIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Gourley v. EmbreeIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Wood v. ClitesIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Smith v. FairfieldIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Continental Insurance v. GueIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Denke-Walter v. LoeperIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Holderman v. WoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  5. Owen v. DresbackIndiana Supreme Court · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API