Legal Opinion
Benbow v. Garrard
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided December 20, 1894No. 17,113PublishedCited by 24 opinions
From the Delaware Circuit.Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, J.
The appellant brought suit -in the circuit court for partition of certain described real estate in Delaware county, against the appellees, William L. Garrard, Riley Garrard, George M. Garrard, Frank Prigg, Edna M. Prigg, and Herbert L. Benbow. The three Garrards filed a cross-complaint against the plaintiff, John C. F. Benbow, and their codefendants, Frank Prigg, Edna M. Prigg, and Herbert L. Benbow, claiming to own all the real estate sought to be parted in the original complaint, and seeking to quiet their title thereto. Issues were formed on the cross-complaint, a trial of which resulted…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gregory v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Gourley v. EmbreeIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Hadley v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- State v. HodginIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by24 opinions
- City of Indianapolis v. ErvinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Vordermark v. WilkinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- State v. LlewellynNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1917
- Smith v. FairfieldIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. AlfordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.