Legal Opinion

Ehrhardt v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 10, 1985No. C-840335PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This cause came on to be heard upon an appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton County.

Third-party plaintiff-appellant, the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company (“B&O”), appeals from the judgment of the trial court which granted summary judgment 1 in favor of third-party defendant-appellee, the Procter & Gamble Company (“P&G”). We find no merit in B&O’s single assignment of error that the trial court erred in granting P&G’s motion for summary judgment.

The facts of the case are not in dispute. Plaintiff, Donald W. Ehrhardt, an employee of P&G, was injured on November 3, 1980, while…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Barrows v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Allied Structural Steel Co. v. SpannausSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Hounshell v. American States InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. King v. Safeco InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Lubrizol Corp. v. National Union Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API