Legal Opinion

Gomez v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Town of Islip

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 2002PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review so much of a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Islip, dated February 8, 2000, as imposed a condition upon the granting of an area variance, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Dunn, J.), entered January 29, 2001, which annulled the condition and remitted the matter for the issuance of the requested variance without the condition.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

It is well settled that a zoning board is vested with great discretion (see Kingsley v…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Khan v. Zoning Board of AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Baker v. BrownlieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Kingsley v. BennettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cerame v. Town of Perinton Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Martin v. Brookhaven Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Fleck v. Town of ColdenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. Voetsch v. CravenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API