Kingsley v. Bennett
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York dated November 29, 1989, which denied the petitioners’ application for a use variance, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Cusick, J.), dated May 24, 1990, which dismissed the petition.
*815Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
In about 1985, the petitioners purchased property located at 37 New Dorp Lane, Staten Island, for the sum of $187,500. The property is improved with a two-story residential…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. HoffmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- MATTER OF DOUGLASTON CIVIC ASS'N, INC. v. KleinNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Faham v. BookmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Carriage Works Enterprises, Ltd. v. SiegelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Kallas v. Board of EstimateNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Supkis v. Town of Sand Lake Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Elwood Properties, Inc. v. BohrerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Dreikausen v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Gomez v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Town of IslipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- SoHo Alliance v. New York City Board of Standards & AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.