Legal Opinion

Bryant v. . Kellum

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 11, 1935PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The statute of limitations having been pleaded, the burden of proof was on the plaintiff to show that his action was brought within the time allowed by the statute. O. S., sec. 416, provides that: “No acknowledgment or promise is evidence of a new or continuing contract, from which the statutes of limitations run, unless it is contained in some writing signed by the party to be charged thereby; but this section does not alter the effect of any payment of principal or interest.” The last clause of this section has been construed bydhis Court in numerous cases, wherein it has been uniformly…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Battle v. . BattleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  2. Nance v. . HulinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Lester Piano Co. v. LovenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McGowan v. BeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Whitley's Electric Service, Inc. v. SherrodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. Craig v. . PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. Wells v. BarefootCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Sanders v. HamiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API