Legal Opinion

Lester Piano Co. v. Loven

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 10, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlaeicsoN, J.

Is tbe plaintiff, under tbe above facts in tbis claim and delivery proceeding, barred by tbe tbree-year statute of limitation? We tbink so.

N. C. Code, 1931 (Michie), sec. 441 (1) and (4), are as follows: “Witbin three years an action — (1) Upon a contract, obligation or liability arising out of a contract, express or implied, except those mentioned in tbe preceding sections. . . . (4) For taking, detaining, converting or injuring any goods or chattels, including action for their specific recovery.”

In Battle v. Battle, 116 N. C., 161 (163-164), it is said: “Tbe Code, sec. 172 (C. S., 416),…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Menzel v. Hinton.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  2. Battle v. . BattleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  3. Wilson v. . HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  4. House v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  5. Cone v. Hyatt.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Spain v. . HinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Bryant v. . KellumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  3. Sanders v. HamiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API