Lester Piano Co. v. Loven
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtOlaeicsoN, J.
Is tbe plaintiff, under tbe above facts in tbis claim and delivery proceeding, barred by tbe tbree-year statute of limitation? We tbink so.
N. C. Code, 1931 (Michie), sec. 441 (1) and (4), are as follows: “Witbin three years an action — (1) Upon a contract, obligation or liability arising out of a contract, express or implied, except those mentioned in tbe preceding sections. . . . (4) For taking, detaining, converting or injuring any goods or chattels, including action for their specific recovery.”
In Battle v. Battle, 116 N. C., 161 (163-164), it is said: “Tbe Code, sec. 172 (C. S., 416),…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Menzel v. Hinton.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Battle v. . BattleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Wilson v. . HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
- House v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Cone v. Hyatt.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Spain v. . HinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Bryant v. . KellumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Sanders v. HamiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951