Craig v. . Price
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.
Plaintiff bases his action upon the alleged breach of an agreement to delay the foreclosure of a deed of trust long in default.
There being no consideration for the promise to extend the time for foreclosure, it will not support a contract enforceable in law, or give ground for an action for damages for its breach. Cromartie v. Lumber Co., 173 N. C., 712; Jackson v. Bank, 203 N. C., 357.
A promise is not binding in law if founded solely on a consideration which the law holds insufficient to create a legal obligation. Hatchell v. Odom, 19 N. C., 302; Williams v. Chevrolet Co., 209 N. C., 29.
The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Winders v. . HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- State Ex Rel. Oliver v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Williams v. Dixie Chevrolet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Hatchell v. . OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1837
- Bryant v. . KellumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Brannock v. FletcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Silver v. North Carolina Board of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Stonestreet v. Southern Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- CERTAIN-TEED PRODUCTS CORPORATION v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Ring Drug Co. v. Carolina Medicorp Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.