Legal Opinion
Bergman v. Aluminum Lock Shingle Corporation Of America
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 14, 1958No. 15589PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
251 F.2d 801
116 U.S.P.Q. 32
Harry X. BERGMAN, Perma-Lox Aluminum Shingle Corporation and
Victor H. Langville, doing business under the
assumed name of Langville Manufacturing
Company, Appellants,
v.
ALUMINUM LOCK SHINGLE CORPORATION OF AMERICA, Appellee.
No. 15589.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
Dec. 13, 1957, Rehearing Denied Feb. 14, 1958.
J. Pierre Kolisch, Ramsey & Kolisch, Portland, Ore., for appellants.
S. J. Bischoff, Portland, Ore., for appellee.
Before HEALY, POPE and LEMMON, Circuit Judges.
LEMMON, Circuit Judge.
Twilight is falling upon 'gadgets' as subjects of patents. The dusk…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Hotchkiss v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Harry A. Pursche v. Atlas Scraper and Engineering Co., a Corporation, Atlas Scraper and Engineering Co., a Corporation v. Harry A. PurscheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Wham-O-Mfg. Co., a Corporation v. Paradise Manufacturing Co., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Griffith Rubber Mills, a Corporation v. Henry S. HoffarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Monolith Portland Midwest Co. v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1967
- Smith-Blair, Inc. v. R. H. Baker & Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.