Legal Opinion
In re Presentment of Passaic County Grand Jury
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 20, 1986PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MANDAK, A.J.S.C.
This opinion is responsive to petitioners’ motion seeking to quash the presentment delivered on January 31, 1986 by the Special Passaic County Grand Jury, January 1985 Stated Session, Panel D, July 1984 Term. The presentment charges three officials of the City of Paterson with mismanaging Comprehensive Employment and Training Act (hereinafter “CETA”) funds. Petitioners, former Paterson municipal officials, challenge the polls of the grand jury on the grounds that the participation of five Paterson residents on the grand jury constitutes a per se inference of bias. It is urged…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Castaneda v. PartidaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. RamseurSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- United States v. Anthony Provenzano, Stephen Andretta, and Thomas AndrettaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bradford v. BrennanConnecticut Superior Court · 1992