Legal Opinion

Bradford v. Brennan

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided October 23, 1992No. File 79581Published

1Opinion of the CourtBlue, J.

In 1863, the Connecticut Supreme Court stated that when a town is sued for damages, a resident and taxpayer of that town is disqualified from being a juror in the case. Bailey v. Trumbull, 31 Conn. 581, 582 (1863). Although Bailey did not cite authority for this rule, it was consistent with the common law of the time. See S. Thompson & E. Merriam, A Treatise on the Organization, Custody and Conduct of Juries (1882), p. 185. In modern times, Bailey has been largely forgotten. Although its rule is occasionally followed, it is, in practice, rather common for jurors to sit, without objection, on…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Castaneda v. PartidaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Georgia v. McCollumSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API