Legal Opinion

Eaton v. San Diego Tuberculosis Ass'n

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 19, 1940No. Civ. 2373PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

This is an appeal from a decree determining that the appellant was entitled, on distribution, to receive only the personal effects of the deceased and that the respondent was entitled to all other property left by her.

The question presented in the trial court and upon this appeal is as to the proper interpretation of the next to the last paragraph of an holographic will left by the deceased, which reads as follows:

“My Last Will and Testament.
“I wish to be cremated, (ashes not to be sent East) All my property to be sold. After all expenses paid. If anything left to go to Rest Haven-Home for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wilson v. ClotfelterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Kovacs v. St. Paul's English Evangelical Lutheran ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Lanterman v. La FetraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Estate of CowdenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Ranagan v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Estate of DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Harding v. KeppnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Estate of SorensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Deacon v. Descendants of Betty SwansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. In Re Estate of ChadwickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API