Lanterman v. La Fetra
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WHITE, J., pro tem.
Stella B. La Fetra died testate November 9, 1933. Through the medium of a holographic will the testatrix made several specific bequests, after which follows the following provision in the will:
‘1 Sixth—The remainder of my estate I wish equally divided among the living nieces and nephews—children of my husband's brothers and sister and my brother’s children allowing C. W. La Fetra a nephew’s portion. Personal property 1 give to Harriet Lula Lloyd <& Frank Lanterman—division to be made by F. D. & R. 8. Lanterman. What no one wants give to charity—”
The trial court found that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wilson v. ClotfelterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- In Re Estate of KochCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Tallman v. TallmanThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1893
- Andrews v. SchoppeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1892
3Cited by10 opinions
- Estate of DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Kruger v. KruegerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Cummings v. CummingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Estate of GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Eaton v. San Diego Tuberculosis Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.