Legal Opinion

Lanterman v. La Fetra

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 16, 1936No. Civ. 11007PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITE, J., pro tem.

Stella B. La Fetra died testate November 9, 1933. Through the medium of a holographic will the testatrix made several specific bequests, after which follows the following provision in the will:

‘1 Sixth—The remainder of my estate I wish equally divided among the living nieces and nephews—children of my husband's brothers and sister and my brother’s children allowing C. W. La Fetra a nephew’s portion. Personal property 1 give to Harriet Lula Lloyd <& Frank Lanterman—division to be made by F. D. & R. 8. Lanterman. What no one wants give to charity—”

The trial court found that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wilson v. ClotfelterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. In Re Estate of KochCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  3. Tallman v. TallmanThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1893
  4. Andrews v. SchoppeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1892

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Estate of DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Kruger v. KruegerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Cummings v. CummingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Estate of GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Eaton v. San Diego Tuberculosis Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API