Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Estate of Sorensen

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 14, 1941No. Civ. 2804PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MUNDO, J.,

pro torn. — Mary Sorensen executed an holographic will as follows:

“MY LAST WILL

Dated Sept 18 —1939

“TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
“My home goes to C. K. Sorensen as a home for him during his life — after that to go to D. S. Jones — Mrs. Frank Clare George Camp to be divided 3 ways. The home to be kept free from morgages and indebtedness. Taxes to be kept paid and property to be kept up. If Mr. C. K. Sorensen does not at any time wish to keep same for a home it is to be sold and divided 4 ways equal D. S. Jones, C. K. Sorensen. Mrs. Frank Clare-Mr. Geo Camp to share alike, if D. S. Jones dies…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of DwyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Estate of LippincottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  3. Barney v. MaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  4. Schroeder v. HappCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Kramer v. KramerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Estate of MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. Harding v. KeppnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Estate of KlewerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. In Re Estate of StengelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Schuster v. SchusterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API