Legal Opinion

High v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 6, 1951No. 55306; protest 145796-K (New York)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Ekwall, Judge:

Plaintiff in this case claims that duty was assessed upon an importation of thin soy upon a value higher than the entered value. At the hearing and in the brief the claim is stated to be “against the decision of the Collector for ‘his refusal to reliquidate any entry for a clerical error discovered within one year after the date of entry or within sixty days after liquidation or reliquidation when such liquidation or reliquidation is made more than ten months after the date of entry.’ ” The error complained of appears on the invoice in connection with casks 39/48 of thin soy…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Igstaedter & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  2. United States v. Woodward-Newhouse Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  3. Ringk & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  4. United States v. DornCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  5. Protest 63552-K of General Hide & Skin Corp.United States Customs Court · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API