Protest 63552-K of General Hide & Skin Corp.
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Ekwall, J.
No testimony was produced and the case was submitted on the official papers and a memorandum filed by the collector. It was stipulated by counsel that the facts set forth in said memorandum are true and correct.. It appeared from these papers that 5 months after the goods had been appraised the customs brokers for the importer requested that the amount of the freight charges be deducted from the entered value. The collector called upon the appraiser to clarify his appraisement, in response to which the appraiser reported: “The correct dutiable value of this mdse, is 12)40…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ringk & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- United States v. Bennett & LoewenthalCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- United States v. DornCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
3Cited by1 opinion
- High v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951