Legal Opinion

Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London v. Arch Specialty Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 11, 2016No. C072500PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HULL, J. —

Two insurers shared indemnification costs to settle claims made against mutual insureds in underlying construction defect litigation brought by third parties. But one insurer — defendant Arch Specialty Insurance Company (Arch) — refused to share the costs to defend the insureds in the underlying litigation. The other insurer — plaintiff Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London (Underwriters) — paid all defense costs and now seeks equitable contribution from Arch. In ruling on cross-motions for summary judgment/adjudication (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c), the trial court concluded…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Admiral InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Hartford Casualty Insurance v. Swift Distribution, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Dart Industries, Inc. v. Commercial Union Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Chamberlin v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. New England Reinsurance Corp. v. Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
  2. LIBERTY INSURANCE UNDERWRITERS, INC., V. BEAUFURN, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2019
  3. Truck Ins. Exchange v. Kaiser Cement & Gypsum Corp.California Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Westport Insurance Corp. v. California Casualty Management Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API