Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London v. Arch Specialty Insurance
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HULL, J. —
Two insurers shared indemnification costs to settle claims made against mutual insureds in underlying construction defect litigation brought by third parties. But one insurer — defendant Arch Specialty Insurance Company (Arch) — refused to share the costs to defend the insureds in the underlying litigation. The other insurer — plaintiff Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London (Underwriters) — paid all defense costs and now seeks equitable contribution from Arch. In ruling on cross-motions for summary judgment/adjudication (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c), the trial court concluded…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Admiral InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Hartford Casualty Insurance v. Swift Distribution, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2014
- Dart Industries, Inc. v. Commercial Union Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Chamberlin v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- New England Reinsurance Corp. v. Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
- LIBERTY INSURANCE UNDERWRITERS, INC., V. BEAUFURN, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2019
- Truck Ins. Exchange v. Kaiser Cement & Gypsum Corp.California Supreme Court · 2024
- Westport Insurance Corp. v. California Casualty Management Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2017