Legal Opinion
Barnett v. Apfel
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided July 9, 1998No. 6:96-cv-01959PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER
HURD, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter is brought pursuant to §§ 205(g) & 1631(b)(3) of the Social Security Act (“Act”), as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) & 1383(c)(3), to review a final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”), denying the plaintiffs claim of Social Security Disability Insurance. The parties have filed their briefs, including the Administrative Record on Appeal, and the matter has been submitted to this Court without oral argument.
I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The plaintiff initially applied for disability benefits in…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Elmer G. Berry v. Richard Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- George MONGEUR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Ramona PEREZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pardee v. AstrueDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2009
- Saxon v. AstrueDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2011
- Crysler v. AstrueDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2008
- Hall v. AstrueDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009
- Cornell v. AstrueDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.