Legal Opinion

Lesperance v. Cooper

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1983No. 14415PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKES, Justice.

Appellant appeals from an Industrial Commission order dismissing his claim for workmen’s compensation. The commission held that the respondent was exempt from workmen’s compensation coverage because his business is an agricultural pursuit.

Before the Industrial Commission, the parties stipulated to a bifurcated procedure wherein the commission would first determine whether the employer’s business was an exempt “agricultural pursuit” under I.C. § 72-212(8),1 then decide other issues in the case, if necessary. The parties then stipulated to the following facts, allowing the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cook v. MasseyIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Mundell v. SwedlundIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Goodson v. LW Hult Produce CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Manning v. Win Her Stables, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Mulanix v. FalenIdaho Supreme Court · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Tuma v. KostermanIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Sellmer v. RuenIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Riggs v. Estate of StandleeIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Whitham v. ParrisCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1986
  5. Becerril v. CallIdaho Supreme Court · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API