Legal Opinion
State v. Namay
City of Cleveland Municipal Court
Decided April 7, 2000No. Nos. CRB 9901821 and CRB 9901810PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lynn C. ToleR, Judge.
This matter comes on for consideration on defendants’ motion to suppress the evidence. The defendants are asking this court to suppress all items and information obtained by the Cleveland Heights Police Department following their entry into 3150 East Derbyshire on September 30, 1999. The defendants seek this relief on the grounds that the police did not have a warrant to enter the premises and that the circumstances giving rise to entry did not fall within any exception to the warrant rule.
The facts adduced at hearing relevant to this matter are as follows. On September…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. Brewster, Unpublished Decision (6-11-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. BrewsterOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. KaltnerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011