Legal Opinion
State v. Brewster
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided May 28, 2004No. Nos. C-030043, C-030052 and C-030053PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Doan, Judge.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Michael Brewster, was convicted of one count of possessing criminal tools pursuant to R.C. 2923.24(A) and ten counts of forgery pursuant to R.C. 2913.31(A)(2) under indictment number B-0108028. He was also convicted of 20 counts of forgery under a second indictment, number B~ 0203401. He appeals from those convictions, raising nine assignments of error, which we address out of order. We affirm the findings of guilt but remand the case for resentencing.
I. Speedy Trial
{¶ 2} In his first assignment of error, Brewster states that the trial court erred in…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. TaylorOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. Gage, Court of Appeals of Ohio, First District, Hamilton County2018
- State v. ChatmonOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. GageOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. HudsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.