Legal Opinion
BLANCAS
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2002No. ID 3477PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
23 I&N Dec. 458
(BIA 2002) Interim Decision #3477 In re Eduardo BLANCAS-Lara, Respondent File A43 038 518 - Otay Mesa Decided June 10, 2002 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals The period of an alien’s residence in the United States after admission as a nonimmigrant may be considered in calculating the 7 years of continuous residence required to establish eligibility for cancellation of removal under section 240A(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a)(2) (Supp. V 1999). FOR RESPONDENT: Jonathan D.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Freytag v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Benjamin Lepe-Guitron v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Dao Vang v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Pedro Garcia-Quintero v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Enrique Cuevas-Gaspar v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Vasquez De Alcantar v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Guevara v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- A-MBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2009
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.